If you’re bearish…

If you’re bearish, the current rally can simply be viewed as an unwind of the bets made by leveraged hedge funds.  The following explination comes from Contraryinvestor.com…

Before rushing to judgment about new bull markets and new cycle credit market and economic expansions based on what we may have "seen" in short term financial market movement, at least personally, we’re going to need a little more corroboration.  Yes, call us conservative.  Yes, call us skeptical.  Extremely guilty as charged.  Why?  First have a peek at the following table.

                   

Asset Class/Investment Vehicle	Price Change From 9/18/07 to 3/14/08
Gold	38.1%
Crude Oil	35.5
Natural Gas	38.0
CRB Index	30.0
XLF – Financials	(30.2)
XLY – Consumer Disco	(19.9)
XBD – Brokers	(33.8)
FRE	(63.7)
FNM	(63.6)
US Dollar	(9.5)
Philly Housing Index	(24.2)

                                       

Now imagine for a second we could turn back the hands of time to the date of the first Fed rate cut in September of last year.  Imagine further that you had suddenly and miraculously been blessed with omniscient financial market foresight that was set to expire, if you will, on Friday the 14 of March in this year.  You are a hedge operator and need to structure a leveraged portfolio for this duration of time.  As you already know by now, the absolute dream levered portfolio would have been long oil, gold, commodities in general, and short financials, discretionary stocks, the brokers, the GSE’s and the housing related stocks.  You would not have hit a home run with a portfolio like this, but rather would have been viewed on par with the second coming of the Messiah.  Long the top four asset classes you see above and short the bottom five could have been close to a career maker for many an investor up until a few Friday’s ago.  Do you think what have been over time trends in these asset class prices escaped the notice of the levered speculating community?  Do you believe those chasing short term performance would not have signed over their first born children to have participated heavily in these trends?  Do you really think the ship was not meaningfully listing to one side by those who had collectively put this very trade on since the first Fed rate cut?

Before answering these questions, have a look at the next table.

            

Asset Class/Investment Vehicle	Price Change From 3/14/08 to 3/20/08
Gold	(8.0)%
Crude Oil	(6.3)
Natural Gas	(8.2)
CRB Index	(7.0)
XLF – Financials	10.6
XLY – Consumer Disco	4.2
XBD – Brokers	3.7
FRE	53.8
FNM	53.4
US Dollar	1.5
Philly Housing Index	9.2

          

We’re sure you are fully aware of what we are getting at here.  What occurred in the week after the Bear Stearns debacle was simply the dream levered hedge portfolio of the last six plus months being turned completely on its head.  And what it clearly suggests as one potentially very meaningful driver of performance during that week was levered speculating community leverage unwinding.  A leverage unwind that is not finished.  As we’re sure you already know, if indeed you were a levered fund either choosing or being forced to unwind a portfolio perhaps due to the heavily increased margin/collateral capital calls from the prime broker community in the wake of Bear’s sudden submergence, the influence of collective levered portfolio unwinding (raising liquidity) might have looked exactly as is detailed in the table above.  To delever you would have sold what you were long and bought what you were short.  So although the CNBC fan club may indeed have tried to celebrate the big bear market bottom for the financial markets, what we may have indeed experienced is simply more significant major macro credit cycle reconciliation – levered investment position unwinding (the hedge and levered speculating community).  Seems relatively logical, no?

And this is the very reason why we suggest meaningful reluctance in proclaiming an all healed and ready to head higher credit cycle that has all of a sudden been reborn due to the fact that a few financial stocks jumped off of their collective death beds.  Although the Fed members have apparently been reannoited as miracle workers, have they really addressed and/or ameliorated THE real problem of the moment which is financial sector balance sheets still loaded with problem credits?  Balance sheets now problem long and capital short.  Quite unfortunately, and we simply wish along with the Street that it weren’t true, a one week change in stock prices does not change balance sheet asset values, especially those values tied to real world residential real estate prices and increasingly commercial real estate values.  So for now, despite the emotional and financial price roller coaster ride of recent weeks,  we reserve judgment on the true character of fundamental credit market, financial market and real economic change that has taken place.  We watch and learn.

"Bear"ied Below The Headlines?…We want to briefly take these comments just one step further in light of a number of financial sector acquisitions we have witnessed this year that would most clearly have had an influential outcome in a good number of credit default swap positions.  Further, why the credit default swap market may indeed be influencing financial market outcomes well beyond the singular world of derivatives.  We’ll make this quick.  You may remember that just last month we devoted an entire discussion to credit default swaps, the leverage that had been built up inside of these contracts, and the potential for risk and unintended consequences therein.  We showed you US banking system derivatives exposure numbers through the third quarter of 2007, as well as what has been the growth in this segment of the broader derivatives world globally.  Please remember, as we described, this derivatives neck of the woods has moved well beyond simply acting as a form of insurance against long oriented bond or credit market positions held by investors to a world of growth in credit default contracts outstanding dedicated to nothing more than the trading of these vehicles themselves.  As we told you then using GM as an example, the credit default vehicles written against real world outstanding company bonds is probably near three times the volume of actual bonds outstanding.  Like many derivatives vehicles, these derivatives products have become an end in and of themselves as opposed to the purity of use of these vehicles to simply insure or hedge against adverse outcomes protecting larger financial asset positions actually held.  Simple translation?  The credit default swaps world has taken on a life of its own.         

Alright, fine, so how does the credit default swap market relate to equity market sector volatility of the moment?  It is absolutely clear that the "acquisition" of Bear avoided triggering Bear Stearns related credit default swaps and swaps against  CDO, SIV, etc. positions they may have held (assuming a potential Bear BK would have forced a mark to market event), which would indeed have happened had Bear formally entered bankruptcy and their bonds/debt became potentially very meaningfully impaired.  There is simply no question whatsoever in our minds that this was the key reason a theoretical acquisition of Bear HAD to happen.  Remember the details.  JPM took out Bear for a couple of hundred million at the headline $2 per share initial offer level, but concurrently announced it was going to need to charge off about $6 billion as a result of the so-called acquisition.  Even at the ultimate $10  level (which is basically shut up money offered to help prevent litigation, which might also have led to asset price discovery) JPM was "telling" us Bear was worth far less than zero by the charge-off number alone.  Of course the truth simply had to be that if Bear had filed bankruptcy and the credit default swaps written against their bonds/debt/asset positions had been triggered, the credit default swap liabilities in the market would have been well north of a $6 billion hit to whomever had written those Bear specific CDS contracts.  Well north.  And that simply could not have been allowed to happen.  By the way, just as an item of curiosity, JP Morgan has exposure to over 55% of the total banking system credit default swaps outstanding.  Are we connecting the dots clearly enough for you?

Sorry, back to the issue at hand.  So Bear avoids formally blowing up and the credit default swaps written against their liabilities/investment positions, etc. now become a moot point as JP Morgan (or for the true problem credits, should we say the Fed) is the new creditor and market based asset price discovery is avoided.  Hurrah for those folks who had written these default swap contracts.  They dodged a massive bullet that was heading one hundred miles per hour directly to a certain spot between their eyes.  But what about those "investors" who had purchased the CDS contracts/insurance against a potential Bear default?  Whether they did this against existing credit market investment positions for insurance reasons or were simply holding them as a trading position is immaterial.  Those CDS contracts purchased which probably had been very profitable, and zoomed straight up in value as Bear was in the process of disintegrating, became worthless with the stroke of a pen (and a $6 billion write down to come).

Now put yourself in the position of a meaningfully levered hedge fund who had purchased CDS contracts against Bear credit vehicles.  You had levered up against what was continually becoming very profitable CDS positions or credits as Bear was heading nose first into the tarmac.  Who knows, you might have even increased the position prior to the weekend based on info your fellow good buddy hedgies were feeding you about Bear’s imminent demise.  When those long CDS contracts against Bear credits/positions went to zero virtually the Monday after the JPM acquisition announcement, all you were left with was massively deflated CDS asset values relative to the prior Friday and still in place leverage.  So what do you do when you get up in the morning on Monday after the Bear acquisition announcement (assuming you slept Sunday night, that is)?  You start delevering.  You start unwinding in place inflation themed trade positions to raise liquidity.  You sell what assets you can (gold, oil, commod’s, etc.) and get less short those sectors you have heavily shorted (financials, brokers, consumer, etc.) to raise liquidity and decrease total leverage against a now immediately diminished asset base.  Who knows, maybe this was exacerbated if your already freaked out prime broker sponsor put in a call or two demanding more margin now that your assets had deflated post the Bear related CDS contracts nose diving.

And it was not just Bear credit default swaps that plummeted.  As you know, with the Bear deal the Fed put in place the primary dealer credit facility, minutes before both Lehman and Goldman showed up at the window with hands held straight out.  Unquestionably CDS values related to Lehman, Merrill, Goldman, etc. evaporated for many a levered investor long those contracts.  And wouldn’t ya know it, it was only one week later, after their earnings were reported, that S&P revised its "outlook" for both Lehman and Goldman to negative from stable.  And that, folks, is how it works.  Without question, the fallout from cascading CDS values for Bear and the other assorted brokers could easily have caused liquidation of meaningfully levered equity positions, both short and long, causing the very movement in sector prices we saw in the latter weeks of last month. 

Believe us, we’re dragging you through this line of reasoning because we believe in the current environment it is nothing short of critical to understand and keep in mind these very important intra market relationships.  We need to understand how what we see in one sector of the financial market can have meaningful implications for asset price movement in many other parts of the very same broader financial market.  What we see in the headlines on TV is shallow, and what we "hear" on CNBC is almost meaningless.  It is the actions and unintended consequences underneath the headlines that are crucial to "see" and understand.  Can the CDS and other derivative markets influence equity market outcomes?  The derivatives tail is indeed wagging the greater financial market dog.  And it is understanding this that we believe is the key to both risk management and successful investment outcomes as the process of credit cycle deleveraging and reconciliation is sure to continue to play out ahead.  Be surprised at nothing.  Do not let short term financial asset price movements that appear illogical throw you off emotionally from remaining focused on the greater credit cycle reconciliation and deleveraging environment that now reigns the day.

Okay, now that we’ve dragged you through this, let’s have a quick look back at another "acquisition" of a financial services company clearly on the ropes earlier this year – Countrywide.  On January 11 of this year, BofA announced the shotgun marriage of the two.  And what did we see after that?  Have a look at the table below.
         

Asset Price Movements Post the 1/11/08 BofA Acquisition of Countrywide
Asset/Investment Vehicle	Price Movement
Crude Oil	(7.0%) in 6 trading days
CRB Index	(2.2%) in 8 trading days
Gold	(4.4%) in 6 trading days
XLF – Financial Sector ETF	7.9% in 15 trading days
XBD – Broker/Dealer Index	9.7% in 15 trading days
XLY – Consumer Discretionary ETF	8.6% in 15 trading days

                

Notice anything special?  In the spirit of complete honesty, we intentionally picked a few subsequent price high and low points for each asset class really in order to get the point across that short term events in the CDS market can indeed influence broader financial market outcomes.  With the decline in gold and oil in the week after the Countrywide acquisition (which would likewise have shattered Countrywide CDS values), was it really the beginning of a straight downhill run for each asset class from there to the present?  Far from it as both turned right around and ran to all time new highs before the recent corrections.  How about the financials, brokers and discretionaries?  Was this three week nicely positive move the bottom of the bear market and economy with an all new bull market commencing thereafter?  You get the picture.  As you know, we wish we knew with absolute certainty where the equity market and the economy are headed, but no one does.  We just need to have a broad enough field of vision to hopefully ask the right questions.  And one question of the moment is the influence of interconnected leverage unwinding and derivatives markets on more conventional equity and bond market short term pricing outcomes.

If we are even close to being correct in terms of this interpretation of CDS and leverage unwinding fallout effects, we need to watch firms such as Wamu, Indymac, etc.  They might not be too big to fail as corporate entities in and of themselves, but are the CDS and other assorted derivative contracts written against or with folks like this too big to allow them to fail and trigger default swap contracts and/or counter party failures?  Talk about the derivatives market tail wagging the proverbial financial market dog.  This is where we are.

So as we move forward in the conventional US equity and debt markets, we need to remember that THE BIG INVESTMENT THEME we are going to be living with for some time to come will be deleveraging.  The wild west, devil may care credit cycle the US has grown to know, love and embrace over the last few decades is over.  We are now embarking upon and in the midst of important secular credit cycle change.  Change which will bring with it important consequences and opportunities very different than what we have come to know and expect over the past.  Will the short-term influence of now in place systemic deleveraging affect short term financial market pricing outcomes as we have already seen in recent months and as we tried to describe in this discussion?  You bet.  Please keep this in mind as you watch the blinking lights on the screen day-to-day.  We suggest that continually remembering the big and now primary investment theme of deleveraging will serve us very well in the months, quarters, and yes even years ahead.  What we are living through now is unlike any cycle of the past few decades where credit cycle reacceleration was key to forward outcomes.  Stand that on it’s head.  That’s in the past.  Deleveraging is the future.  The world is not about to come to an end, just the type of thinking and actions of the last few decades in response to the greater credit cycle that has peaked.

Bank Shots…We’ll leave you with one last thought about the near term before signing off.  Indeed it appears as though at times over the past month, we have been staring into the financial system abyss, so to speak.  Why has it felt this way?  Probably because in many senses we have been staring into the abyss.  Right to the point, at least in our minds, the near term critical issue for the financial markets is bank capital.  The commercial and investment banks absolutely must raise capital.  And that’s not going to be a fun experience.  Fed actions are only buying time.  Watch for this to come and soon.  Lehman’s quarter end announcement simply reinforces this message/theme in our minds.  Why?  Because if the banks/investment banks don’t act to raise capital and do it quickly, financial market and credit cycle troubles will accelerate meaningfully downward.  If indeed the capital raising process comes to pass, as we believe, the markets will stop trying to discount a crisis environment and can more realistically begin to asses by sector the implications of a very slow and drawn out economic recovery brought to you by the key investment theme of the moment which is deleveraging.